学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

中英诉讼文书中衔接手段的比较研究

作　者: 蒋贵芹
导　师: 张剑波
学　校: 西南政法大学
专　业: 英汉对比法律语言学
关键词: 衔接语篇衔接手段古语体词诉讼文书
分类号: D90-055
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2010年
下　载: 103次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

衔接是文本的普遍特征,是生成语篇的必要条件。尽管国内外的语言学家在衔接这个领域已经做了很多研究,但其主要是对文学、诗歌等文体中的衔接手段的研究。不同文体所使用的衔接手段不同,诉讼文书是一种法律文本,其衔接手段的运用与这些文学作品存在差异。因此,作者以诉讼文书这种法律文本为视角,探讨了中英诉讼文书中的主要衔接手段及其运用上的异同。本研究在韩礼德和哈桑的衔接理论的基础上用定量分析法对中英诉讼文书中的衔接手段进行了比较分析,初步得出以下结论:中英诉讼文书中使用频率较高的衔接手段是照应、名词性替代、连接词语、重复和搭配,并且这些衔接手段在诉讼文书中有其自身的特点,比如频繁使用古语体词作为指示指称、频繁使用重复手段等。另外,在英语诉讼文书中经常使用“where”来表达因果关系。本研究尝试在诉讼文书这种法律文本中研究衔接手段,提供了研究衔接手段的新视角,为法律翻译工作者提供了一个理论框架和实用性参考,对中英诉讼文书间的互译有一定的指导意义,其中对我国和英语国家诉讼文书中的主要衔接手段进行的对比研究,有利于促进我国和英语国家间的法律交流。

全文目录

Acknowledgements  4-5
Abstract  5-6
摘要  6-10
Chapter One Introduction  10-14
  1.1 Purpose and significance of the study  11-12
  1.2 Research questions  12
  1.3 Research methodology and data collection  12-13
  1.4 Outline of the study  13-14
Chapter Two Literature Review  14-22
  2.1 Studies on cohesion  14-17
  2.2 Studies on cohesive devices  17-19
  2.3 Studies on characteristics of litigation writing  19-21
  2.4 Studies on cohesive devices in Chinese and English litigation writing  21
  2.5 Summary  21-22
Chapter Three The Cohesive Devices More Frequently Employed in Chinese and English Litigation writing  22-42
  3.1 Theoretical framework  22-24
  3.2 Research procedure  24-25
  3.3 Frequency of cohesive devices in Chinese and English litigation writing  25-38
    3.3.1 Frequency of reference in Chinese and English litigation writing  26-29
      3.3.1.1 Personal reference  26-27
      3.3.1.2 Demonstrative reference  27-28
      3.3.1.3 Comparative reference  28-29
    3.3.2 Frequency of substitution in Chinese and English litigation writing  29-32
      3.3.2.1 Nominal substitution  29-31
      3.3.2.2 Verbal substitution  31
      3.3.2.3 Clausal substitution  31-32
    3.3.3 Frequency of ellipsis in Chinese and English litigation writing  32-34
      3.3.3.1 Nominal ellipsis  32-33
      3.3.3.2 Verbal ellipsis  33
      3.3.3.3 Clausal ellipsis  33-34
    3.3.4 Frequency of conjunction in Chinese and English litigation writing  34-37
      3.3.4.1 Additive conjunction  34-35
      3.3.4.2 Adversative conjunction  35-36
      3.3.4.4 Temporal conjunction  36-37
    3.3.5 Frequency of lexical cohesion in Chinese and English litigation writing  37-38
  3.4 The more frequently employed cohesive devices in Chinese and English litigation writing  38-41
  3.5 Summary  41-42
Chapter Four The Similarities and Discrepancies of the More Frequently Employed Cohesive Devices Between Chinese and English Litigation Writing  42-53
  4.1 Similarities of the more frequently employed cohesive devices between Chinese and English litigation writing  42-47
    4.1.1 Similarities in reference between Chinese and English litigation writing  42-44
    4.1.2 Similarities in nominal substitution between Chinese and English litigation writing  44-45
    4.1.3 Similarities in conjunction between Chinese and English litigation writing  45-46
    4.1.4 Similarities in lexical cohesion between Chinese and English litigation writing  46-47
  4.2 Discrepancies of the more frequently employed cohesive devices between Chinese and English litigation writing  47-52
    4.2.1 Discrepancies in reference between Chinese and English litigation writing  47-50
    4.2.2 Discrepancies in nominal substitution between Chinese and English litigation writing  50
    4.2.3 Discrepancies in conjunction between Chinese and English litigation writing  50-51
    4.2.4 Discrepancies in lexical cohesion between Chinese and English litigation writing  51-52
  4.3 Summary  52-53
Chapter Five Conclusion  53-57
  5.1 Summary of the present study  53-55
  5.2 Possible contributions of the present study  55-56
  5.3 Suggestions for further study  56-57
Bibliography  57-59

中英诉讼文书中衔接手段的比较研究

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文