学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

从会话含义看法庭交叉询问中对证词的质疑

作　者: 李楠
导　师: 杜金榜
学　校: 广东外语外贸大学
专　业: 外国语言学及应用语言学
关键词: 会话含义质疑交叉询问
分类号: D90-055
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2006年
下　载: 201次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

本文对法庭交叉询问中会话含义的现象进行研究,旨在揭示会话含义对公诉人/律师在法庭交叉询问中实现质疑证人/被告证词目的所起的作用并发现主要的会话含义的语言实现形式。根据Levinson的会话含义原则,我们在汉语法庭的交叉询问中辨别出三种会话含义的推导策略:扩展,详述和否定。在每个策略下面介绍了一些语言实现形式,例如:推导出强的表达方式来否定证人/被告的证词,使证人/被告说出额外的含义,确切说明某专门术语以揭露更多的内容等。本文进一步展示公诉人/律师怎样用他们从证人/被告的证词中得出的会话含义来质疑证人/被告的证词。公诉人/律师一般从四个方面来质疑证人/被告的证词语:客观性、一致性、资格和能力。我们希望本文的研究能够有助于认识会话含义对质疑证人/被告证词的作用,加深对会话含义理论的了解;有助于律师更好地利用会话含义推导策略,从而使他们在法庭交叉询问中的工作更有效。

全文目录

Declaration  3-4
Acknowledgements  4-5
Abstract (English)  5-6
Abstract (Chinese)  6-7
Transcription Conventions  7-8
Contents  8-10
Chapter 1 Introduction  10-14
  1.1 Introduction  10
  1.2 Rationale  10-11
  1.3 Objectives of the Study  11-12
  1.4 Data and Methodology  12-13
  1.5 The Organization of the Thesis  13-14
Chapter 2 Literature Review  14-26
  2.1 Introduction  14
  2.2 Studies on Challenge of Witnesses/defendants' Testimony in Cross-examination  14-16
    2.2.1 Domestic researches  14-15
    2.2.2 Overseas researches  15-16
  2.3 Overview of the Theory of Conversational Implicature  16-25
    2.3.1 Conversational implicature in ordinary talk  17-24
    2.3.2 Conversational implicature in the legal context  24-25
  2.4 Summary  25-26
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework  26-34
  3.1 Introduction  26
  3.2 Levinson's Theory of Conversational Implicature  26-29
  3.3Conversational Implicature and Challenge of Testimony  29-31
  3.4 Theoretical Framework  31-34
Chapter 4 Manifestation of Conversational Implicuture in Cross-examination.  34-41
  4.1 Introduction  34
  4.2 Absence of Particularized Implicature  34-36
  4.3 Explicitness  36-38
  4.4 Redundancy  38-40
  4.4 Summary  40-41
Chapter 5 Deriving Conversational Implicature in Cross-examination  41-51
  5.1 Introduction  41
  5.2 Conversational Implicature-deriving Strategies  41-50
    5.2.1 Using Q-principle to derive conversational implicature  41-43
    5.2.2 Using I-principle to derive conversational implicature  43-47
    5.2.3 Using M-principle to derive conversational implicature  47-50
  5.4 Summary  50-51
Chapter 6 The Function of Conversational Implicaure in Challenging  51-60
  6.1 Introduction  51
  6.2 Challenging Objectivity  51-54
    6.2.1 Challenging the objectivity of the source of testimony  51-52
    6.2.2 Challenging the objectivity of the contents of testimony  52-54
  6.3 Challenging Consistency  54-56
    6.3.1 Challenging consistency in trial testimony  54-55
    6.3.2 Challenging consistency between statements in prior records and cross-examination  55-56
  6.4 Challenging Qualifications  56-57
  6.5 Challenging Capability  57-59
  6.6 Summary  59-60
Chapter7 Conclusion  60-64
  7.1 Summary of the Present Study  60-61
  7.2 Conclusions  61
  7.3 Implications  61-62
  7.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research  62-64
Appendix Data Used in the Present Research  64-65
References:  65-67

从会话含义看法庭交叉询问中对证词的质疑

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文