学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

规范性法律语篇中互文符号的翻译研究

作　者: 冯海霞
导　师: 张新红
学　校: 广东外语外贸大学
专　业: 外国语言学及应用语言学
关键词: 互文性互文符号互文对等法律对等语义翻译
分类号: H059
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2005年
下　载: 297次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

本文旨在研究法律文本中互文现象的理解及其在译文中的表达问题。互文性通过互文符号这一手段广泛存在于法律文本中,本文通过对规范性法律文本中互文符号的识别、理解及其翻译策略的研究,探讨如何在法律翻译中传递原文中的互文性、达到译文与原文之间的互文对等。翻译可以看作是对原文的理解和对译文的表达的一个过程,因此,本文从这两个阶段展开对互文符号翻译的探讨。在互文性的理解阶段,作者根据Hatim & Mason提出的互文性分类模式,从四个层面展开对互文性及互文符号的探讨:语义、句法、篇章及文化层面。语义层面包括:参照、陈词滥调、法律术语、套语、和词语重复;句法层面包括中英思维差异造成的各种句式差异如中文话题句、无主句、及英文复杂句、被动句等:篇章层面包括:语类、主题或话题、结构、功能:文化层面包括法律制度、法律文化、及文化概念。通过对法律文本中互文性的分析发现,对互文性的理解是正确理解法律语篇的必要条件,互文性在译文中的正确表达对法律翻译来说至关重要。互文符号是构建法律文本必不可少的手段。因此互文符号的翻译是达到原文与译文之间互文对等的关键所在。本文第二部分展开了对法律文本中互文符号翻译原则、策略、方法的探讨。法律文本的特点决定了译文必须严格忠实于原文,原文与译文间的法律对等为翻译的基本原则,因此法律对等为互文符号翻译提供了指导原则。在法律翻译中,译者要用目的语重现原文中的各种互文信息,使译文的读者与原文的读者产生某种共鸣,从而达到原文与译文的互文对等。在此原则指导下,本文从四个层面对互文符号的具体翻译技巧进行了探讨。通过分析,作者发现:语义上,原文一些参照手段、古词、外来词、法律术语等,可以通过对应的方法传递到译文中,而在译入语中找不到对等词时,可以通过加注、词义扩充、替换等办法来忠实地再现原文信息;句法上,可以采取语法补足、转化、省略、结构调整等方法,来达到原文与译文的法律对等;篇章上,法

全文目录

Declaration  3-4
Acknowledgements  4-5
Abstract (English)  5-7
Abstract (Chinese)  7-9
Abbreviation  9-10
Contents  10-17
Chapter 1 Introduction  17-24
  1.1 Introduction  17-20
  1.2 The Rationale of the Present Study  20-21
  1.3 Objectives of the Present Study  21-22
  1.4 Data and Methodology  22-23
  1.5 Organization of the Thesis  23-24
Chapter 2 Literature Review  24-44
  2.1 Introduction  24
  2.2 Studies on Intertextuality  24-34
    2.2.1 The Origin of the Theory  24-27
      2.2.1.1 Saussure's Sign System  24-25
      2.2.1.2 Bakhtin's Theory of "Dialogism"  25-27
    2.2.2 Kristeva: Dialogism to Intertextuality  27-29
    2.2.3 Other Researches on Intertextuality  29-34
  2.3 Translation as an Intertextual Activity  34-36
  2.4 Studies of Legal Language and Legal Translation  36-42
    2.4.1 Legal Language and Its Classification  36-38
    2.4.2 Criteria, Principle and Methods for Legal Translation  38-41
      2.4.2.1 Criteria for Legal Translation  38
      2.4.2.2 Principle for Legal Translation  38-40
      2.4.2.3 Methods for Legal Translation  40-41
    2.4.3 Qualifications of Legal Translators  41-42
  2.5 Summary  42-44
Chapter 3 Description of the Theoretical Framework  44-60
  3.1 Introduction  44
  3.2 Hatim & Mason's Typology of Intertextuality  44-46
  3.3 Categorization of Intertextual Signals in Legal Texts  46-48
    3.3.1 Definition of Intertextual Signals  46-47
    3.3.2 Categorization of Intertextual Signals  47-48
  3.4 Principle, Process and Strategies for Translating Intertextual Signals  48-56
    3.4.1 The Equivalence Principle  48-50
    3.4.2 The Process of Translating Intertextual Signals  50-52
    3.4.3 Strategy for Translating Intertextual Signals in Legal Texts  52-55
    3.4.4 The Suggested Methods for Translating Intertextual Signals  55-56
  3.5 Theoretical Framework for the Present Study  56-59
  3.6 Summary  59-60
Chapter 4 Analysis of Intertextuality in Legal Texts  60-94
  4.1 Introduction  60-61
  4.2 Intertextuality at the Semantic Level  61-77
    4.2.1 Reference  62-67
    4.2.2 Lexical Reiteration  67-69
    4.2.3 Cliche  69-76
      4.2.3.1 Frequent Use of Archaic Words  70-71
      4.2.3.2 Frequent Use of Loan Words  71-73
      4.2.3.3 Frequent Use of Technical Words  73-75
      4.2.3.4 Frequent Use of Common Words with Special Legal Meaning  75-76
    4.2.4 Conventionalism  76-77
  4.3 Intertextuality at the Syntactic Level  77-78
    4.3.1 Long and Complex Sentences  77-78
  4.4 Intertextuality at the Textual Level  78-86
    4.4.1 Generic Intertextuality  78-80
    4.4.2 Thematic/Topical Intertextuality  80-82
    4.4.3 Structural Intertextuality  82-84
    4.4.4 Functional Intertextuality  84-86
  4.5 Intertextuality at the Cultural Level  86-92
    4.5.1 Legal System  88-91
    4.5.2 Legal Concepts  91-92
  4.6 Summary  92-94
Chapter 5 Analysis of Translating Intertextual Signals in Legal Texts  94-123
  5.1 Introduction  94
  5.2 Specific Techniques Used in Translating Intertextual Signals  94-121
    5.2.1 At the Semantic Level  94-108
      5.2.1.1 Reference  95-99
      5.2.1.2 Archaic Words  99-103
      5.2.1.3 Legal Terminology  103-104
      5.2.1.4 Loan Words  104-107
      5.2.1.5 Common Words with Legal Meaning  107-108
    5.2.2 At the Syntactic Level  108-116
      5.2.2.1 Intertextuality between Thought Pattern and Syntactic Structure  108-109
      5.2.2.2 Specific Techniques Used at the Syntactic Level  109-116
        5.2.2.2.1 Grammatical Supplement  109-110
        5.2.2.2.2 Omission of Category Words  110-111
        5.2.2.2.3 Conversion of Voice  111
        5.2.2.2.4 Structural Adjustment  111-112
        5.2.2.2.5 Readjustment of Long and Complex Sentences  112-115
        5.2.2.2.6 The Handling of Sentences with "的" in Chinese Legal Text  115-116
    5.2.3 At the Textual Level  116-119
    5.2.4 At the Cultural Level  119-121
      5.2.4.1 Conceptual Incongruency  119-121
  5.3 Summary  121-123
Chapter 6 Conclusion  123-129
  6.1 Overview of the Present Study  123-124
  6.2 Major Findings  124-127
  6.3 Implications  127
  6.4 Limitations  127-128
  6.5 Suggestions for Further Studies  128-129
Bibliography  129-136

规范性法律语篇中互文符号的翻译研究

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文