学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

法律语言学家作为专家证人在我国司法活动中的价值

作　者: 李奉玲
导　师: 肖云枢
学　校: 西南政法大学
专　业: 外国语言学及应用语言学
关键词: 专家证人法律语言学法律语言学家司法价值
分类号: D90-055
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2012年
下　载: 10次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

随着法学和语言学的融合及应用语言学的深入研究,法律语言学家在立法和司法活动中的重要性日趋凸显。从国内外所发表的学术观点来看,法律语言学家对立法的完善具有重要作用,同时法律语言学家通过对法规、合同等法律文本所涉及的法律争议问题的诠释出庭作证将有助于司法活动目的的实现。尤其是,法律语言学家作为专家证人在涉及到语言争议的案件中起到至关重要的作用,因为普通人甚至是法官等法律界人士都不可能精通语言和法律语言。虽然法律语言学已确立并不断完善,对于许多陪审团、法官、律师及其他法学专家仍旧是新鲜事物。法律语言学家在我国司法活动中的重要性并没有被大众甚至法学专家所承认。法律届人士并不认为语言学家在法学领域具有专业知识,他们认为那是他们的领域。然而,著名学者麦考密的观点“法学其实不过是一门法律语言学”有力地阐明了法律与语言学的紧密关系,法学人士的这种观点显然并不正确。在我国,已出现一些涉及到语言争议问题的案件开始向语言学家求助,但是由于各种法律因素及以上所述原因,实际成效并不见好。然而事实上,在普通法系许多国家,法律语言学家作为专家证人在其司法活动中都具有极其重要价值,有利于案件的各方以及法官判案。由此,本文将对法律语言学家作为专家证人在我国司法活动中的价值进行尝试研究,以期我国法学界重视语言学的价值,承认语言学家的专业性并给与其施展专业才能的空间,这将不仅有利于完善我国现有的鉴定人制度也有利于法律语言学理论应用的发展。

全文目录

Acknowledgments  4-5
Abstract  5-7
摘要  7-8
Contents  8-11
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION  11-16
  1.1 Overview  11-12
  1.2 The Rationale of the Present Study  12-13
  1.3 Objectives and Research Questions  13-14
  1.4 Data and Methodology  14
  1.5 The Organization of the Thesis  14-16
CHAPTER TWO FORENSIC LINGUISTICS AND FORENSIC LINGUISTS INCHINA  16-25
  2.1 Relationship between Law and Language  16-18
  2.2 Study on Forensic linguistics in China  18-20
    2.2.1 Brief Introduction to Forensic Linguistics  18-19
    2.2.2 Research Fields and Achievements of Forensic Linguistics  19-20
  2.3 Forensic Linguists in China  20-23
    2.3.1 Distinction between Linguists and Forensic Linguists  20-22
    2.3.2 Current Situation of Forensic Linguists in China  22-23
  2.4 Summary  23-25
CHAPTER THREE EXPERT WITNESSES SYSTEM AND FORENSIC LINGUISTSAS EXPERT WITNESSES  25-34
  3.1 Expert Witnesses System  25-30
    3.1.1 Connotation of Expert witnesses  25-26
    3.1.2 Expert Witnesses in the Countries of Common Law System  26-27
    3.1.3 The Significance of Establishing Expert Witnesses System  27-28
    3.1.4 Reflection on the Appraisal System in China  28-30
  3.2 Forensic Linguists as Expert Witnesses  30-33
    3.2.1 Qualification  30-31
    3.2.2 Forensic Linguists as Expert Witnesses in the Countries of Common Law System  31-32
    3.2.3 Prospect of Forensic Linguists as Expert Witnesses in China  32-33
  3.3 Summary  33-34
CHAPTER FOUR THE VALUE OF FORENSIC LINGUISTS AS EXPERTWITNESSES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE  34-53
  4.1 Introduction  34-35
  4.2 The Role of Forensic Phonetics  35-38
    4.2.1 Brief Introduction to Forensic Phonetics  35-36
    4.2.2 Forensic Phonetics in Voice Identification  36-38
  4.3 The Role of Semantic Analysis  38-40
    4.3.1 Brief Introduction to Semantic Analysis  38-39
    4.3.2 Functions of Semantic Analysis  39-40
  4.4 The Role of Discourse Analysis  40-44
    4.4.1 Brief Introduction of Discourse Analysis  40-41
    4.4.2 Discourse Analysis of Statement in Judicial Proceedings  41-43
    4.4.3 Discourse Analysis of Records  43-44
  4.5 The Role of Forensic Stylistics  44-49
    4.5.1 Brief Introduction to Forensic Stylistics  44-46
    4.5.2 Forensic Stylistics in Plagiarism Cases  46-48
    4.5.3 Forensic Stylistics in Authorship Identification  48-49
  4.6 The Role of Linguistic Dialectology  49-52
    4.6.1 Brief Introduction to Linguistic Dialectology  49-50
    4.6.2 The Value of Idiolect to Identification of Speaker  50-51
    4.6.3 Dialectologists as an Interpreter in Court  51-52
  4.7 Summary  52-53
CHAPTER FIVE FORENSIC LINGUISTS ENGAGED IN THEADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN CHINA  53-56
  5.1 Limiting Factors  53-54
  5.2 Cases that Forensic Linguists Engaged in  54-56
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION  56-60
  6.1 Summary of the Present Study  56-57
  6.2 Conclusions  57-58
  6.3 Implications  58-59
  6.4 Limitations  59
  6.5 Suggestions for Further Research  59-60
References  60-62
Appendix  62-64

法律语言学家作为专家证人在我国司法活动中的价值

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文